On Fri March 11 2005 09:33, Tony Finch wrote:
I'm talking about the following part of the syntax, which gives the
resent- fields a special status w.r.t. the trace fields, and does not
allow anyone to extend the message format with new header fields which
(like resent-*) appear amongst the Received: fields.
fields = *(trace
*(resent-date /
resent-from /
resent-sender /
resent-to /
resent-cc /
resent-bcc /
resent-msg-id))
*(orig-date /
...
In light of the fact that ordering is not significant and
cannot be guaranteed, why does it matter -- how does:
optional-field)
from the same section not work?