Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference)
2007-11-16 02:11:12
David F. Skoll writes:
Yeah, I know, but spammers can do that with or without
content-filtering. Sure, they'll overwhelm you a bit sooner if you
use content-filtering than if you don't, but that's about it.
Absolutely.
How big is the "a bit" you mention, btw? I don't remember, was it about
a factor of 10 or 20 or so?
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), (continued)
- Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), David F. Skoll
- Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference),
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, changed delivery requirement, Douglas Otis
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Peter J. Holzer
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John C Klensin
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John C Klensin
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie
- Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John C Klensin
|
|
|