IETF SMTP (date)

IETF SMTP (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

November 30, 2007

rfc2821 New Issue: Section 4.3.2, the "anywhere" codes, and related topics, John C Klensin, 11:23

November 29, 2007

Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 22:26
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Tony Hansen, 20:28
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Glenn Anderson, 19:17
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 18:24
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 18:17
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Glenn Anderson, 17:35
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, John C Klensin, 17:05
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 16:32
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 15:26
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:08
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 13:46
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 13:36
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:08
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 12:45
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:29
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 11:54
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:54

November 28, 2007

Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 23:03
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, SM, 21:57
Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, John C Klensin, 17:51
New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos, 15:59

November 27, 2007

Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, Frank Ellermann, 10:27
RE: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, Tony Finch, 06:47
Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, Valdis . Kletnieks, 01:42
Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, Frank Ellermann, 00:21

November 26, 2007

Re: FWD: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard, Tony Hansen, 20:24
Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:29
FWD: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard, John C Klensin, 18:55
RE: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, John C Klensin, 08:56

November 25, 2007

Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, ned+ietf-smtp, 18:34
Re: Possible ambiguity in SMTP RFC2821 - your opinon please, John C Klensin, 15:59

November 22, 2007

Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Hector Santos, 03:31
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Hector Santos, 03:18
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Frank Ellermann, 00:31

November 21, 2007

Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 14:26
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), Tony Finch, 13:26
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 13:09
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), Tony Finch, 12:40
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:26

November 20, 2007

Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Hector Santos, 22:02
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Valdis . Kletnieks, 17:57
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Hector Santos, 17:25
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Douglas Otis, 11:44

November 19, 2007

Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Dave Crocker, 17:57
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:04
SRS and TBR (was: Fixing graylisting), Frank Ellermann, 03:04

November 18, 2007

Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?, Pete Resnick, 22:01
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), John C Klensin, 20:31
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, John C Klensin, 20:30
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting, Hector Santos, 20:07
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), ned+ietf-smtp, 18:46
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Dave Crocker, 17:55
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, John C Klensin, 17:32
Re: 2nd attempt Retry Time - Real World Examples, Hector Santos, 16:08
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Robert A. Rosenberg, 14:37
Re: Fixing Greylist - Its usage of 451 vs 450, SM, 12:21
Re: 2nd attempt Retry Time - Real World Examples, David F. Skoll, 11:04
Re: Greylisting pitfalls, Peter J. Holzer, 10:55
Re: Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation), David F. Skoll, 09:53
2nd attempt Retry Time - Real World Examples, Hector Santos, 09:04
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 05:22
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Alexey Melnikov, 05:20
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), SM, 02:20
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, John C Klensin, 01:28

November 17, 2007

Fixing Greylist - Its usage of 451 vs 450, Hector Santos, 23:00
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), ned+ietf-smtp, 20:23
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Robert A. Rosenberg, 20:23
Re: 2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), SM, 17:19
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, SM, 16:14
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Peter J. Holzer, 15:03
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Peter J. Holzer, 12:06
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Peter J. Holzer, 11:58
Re: Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation), Peter J. Holzer, 11:57
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Peter J. Holzer, 11:48
2821bis and address rewriting (was: Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), John C Klensin, 10:12
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, SM, 10:00
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Hector Santos, 09:05
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:58
Re: Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation), Hector Santos, 08:56
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], ned+ietf-smtp, 08:22
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 08:17
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 08:10
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 08:09
Greylisting pitfalls (was Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation), David F. Skoll, 07:59
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 05:56
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 05:30
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, SM, 01:42
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01:11
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], SM, 00:01
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, SM, 00:00

November 16, 2007

Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, John C Klensin, 22:30
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 20:03
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 19:44
Nature of spammers (was Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference)), David F. Skoll, 19:26
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), John C Klensin, 18:34
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 18:23
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Hector Santos, 16:37
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Glenn Anderson, 15:50
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 14:50
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, SM, 11:01
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference // Alternative to Temp Error resource protection, Douglas Otis, 09:46
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John C Klensin, 08:35
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 08:22
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie, 07:58
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 07:36
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 07:29
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 07:04
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John C Klensin, 04:18
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:11
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, SM, 00:47

November 15, 2007

Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:21
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), David F. Skoll, 19:47
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Glenn Anderson, 19:10
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Hector Santos, 18:13
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 17:35
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 17:23
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), John C Klensin, 17:13
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, John C Klensin, 16:57
Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Glenn Anderson, 16:48
Re: DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), Glenn Anderson, 16:28
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], SM, 16:27
2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation, Hector Santos, 16:17
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, changed delivery requirement, Douglas Otis, 15:57
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Hector Santos, 15:56
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John C Klensin, 15:08
DoS attacks (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), David F. Skoll, 15:05
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], David F. Skoll, 14:40
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Hector Santos, 14:06
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 13:59
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:53
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Douglas Otis, 13:35
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, David F. Skoll, 13:27
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], SM, 13:11
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, David F. Skoll, 12:47
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], David F. Skoll, 12:34
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 12:12
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Douglas Otis, 11:26
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:53
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Hector Santos, 02:22

November 14, 2007

Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 11:46
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Hector Santos, 08:31
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker, 06:34
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John C Klensin, 06:11
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01:51

November 13, 2007

Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 19:58
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 17:06
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:55
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], SM, 14:53
Re: Fixing graylisting, Russ Allbery, 14:47
TBR again (was Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR]), David F. Skoll, 14:19
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker, 14:03
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Dave Crocker, 13:33
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie, 13:30
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie, 13:24
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 13:22
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 13:04
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Tony Finch, 11:32
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker, 11:28
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:59
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], David F. Skoll, 10:30
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie, 10:03
Re: Fixing graylisting [was TBR], Dave Crocker, 09:46
Fixing graylisting [was TBR], John Leslie, 09:35
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, David F. Skoll, 08:42
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:01
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, David F. Skoll, 05:32
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:53
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Tony Finch, 03:09
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Frank Ellermann, 00:50

November 12, 2007

Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, SM, 15:11
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, David F. Skoll, 15:03
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:28
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 14:14
Re: response to David?, David F. Skoll, 13:01
Greylisting usefulness (was Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference), David F. Skoll, 12:34
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Douglas Otis, 12:15
response to David?, John Leslie, 12:06
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker, 11:47
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie, 11:32
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Tony Finch, 10:00
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker, 10:00
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, David F. Skoll, 09:28
Re: SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, Dave Crocker, 09:22
SMTP Transferred-By-Reference, John Leslie, 08:33

November 01, 2007

Re: Mailing List Last Call now open for draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-05.txt, Tony Hansen, 19:08