ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy recommendation

2007-11-18 14:37:21

At 03:08 -0500 on 11/18/2007, John C Klensin wrote about Re: 2821bis consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy :

--On Saturday, 17 November, 2007 21:54 -0500 "Robert A.
Rosenberg" <hal9001(_at_)panix(_dot_)com> wrote:


 At 00:20 -0800 on 11/17/2007, SM wrote about Re: 2821bis
 consideration - New 2nd attempt Retry Strategy :

 It's only a lot of retries over four or five days if you
 retry too  frequently.  Some view the period as too long.  A
 two-day give-up  period, for example, may result in delivery
 issues being missed if  it falls over a weekend

 You need at least 4 days to handle 3 day weekends (a holiday
 on Friday or Monday) although I've seen 4 day Holidays (Xmas
 and New Years on a Friday and the company shutting down at
 Noon on Thursday). A better idea is to use 3 days BUT adjust
 it to 4 or 5 days when there is a Friday/Monday holiday
 (although that can still run into problems since it is US
 Centric and can run afoul of Non-US Holidays).

And that is exactly why the guidance in the spec says what it
does.

   john

My comment was specifically directed to the suggestion to trim the give-up period back to 2 days. I pointed out that weekends are not the only problem with 2 days. If someone DOES decide that 2 days is enough, that should be defined as 2 business days and automatically adjusted when 2 business days spans more than 2 calender days. IOW: Account for Holidays and Weekends that fall during the next 2 calender days (ie: Set the give-up date on a message to 2 calender days after submission). This still is US Centric about Holidays but it does allow for the shortened give-up period when it will not run into problems.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>