Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification


Hi Hector,
At 14:39 28-11-2007, Hector Santos wrote:

I just came across a transaction where a Microsoft ESMTP serverrejected it with a 421 response.

Are you sure it's a Microsoft ESTMP server and not some applicationproxy filtering SMTP commands?


Regards,

-sm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, John C Klensin Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, John C Klensin Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Tony Hansen Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Glenn Anderson Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Glenn Anderson Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, SM <= Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, John C Klensin
Next by Date:	Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos
Previous by Thread:	Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos
Next by Thread:	Re: New Issue: NOOP clarification, Hector Santos
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]