[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis

2008-07-17 16:14:39

John C Klensin wrote:
I'd like to propose the following as a way of moving the
document forward without an IESG Note or other (IMO) nonsense.
Note that parts of it are probably an improvement to the
document and its organization.  The rest is, IMO, _very_

+1 to the assessment and intent.

+1 to the changes


(1) Rename section 2.3, now called "Terminology" to "SMTP

With my above tally in mind, I'll nonetheless observe that anyone who actually thinks this sort of change is meaningful is suffering from some sort of underlying disease that is frankly dangerous.

I'm not criticizing making the change as the expedient it is intended to be. I'm criticizing the fact that there is a situation in which it serves as an expedient.



  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking