John C Klensin wrote:
I'd like to propose the following as a way of moving the
document forward without an IESG Note or other (IMO) nonsense.
Note that parts of it are probably an improvement to the
document and its organization. The rest is, IMO, _very_
innocuous
+1 to the assessment and intent.
+1 to the changes
Proposal:
(1) Rename section 2.3, now called "Terminology" to "SMTP
Terminology"
With my above tally in mind, I'll nonetheless observe that anyone who
actually thinks this sort of change is meaningful is suffering from some
sort of underlying disease that is frankly dangerous.
I'm not criticizing making the change as the expedient it is intended to
be. I'm criticizing the fact that there is a situation in which it
serves as an expedient.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net