Re: Processing after the end of DATA

On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> On 8/9/2010 5:25 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
> > > Can folks offer pointers to normative language?
> > Tail end of section 6.1 of 5321:
> >
> > "To avoid receiving duplicate messages as the result of timeouts, a
> >    receiver-SMTP MUST seek to minimize the time required to respond to
> >    the final<CRLF>.<CRLF>  end of data indicator. "
> >
> > However the same section also says:
> Thanks!
>
> And, yeah, it might be worth reviewing both normative directives.
+1