John C Klensin wrote:
Given the amount of sage commentary has been posted, is there
a document that should be produced?
I think that is exactly what Paul Smith and I were discussing in
our most recent few exchanges.
I would like to thank Paul for recognizing the problem and concerns I
highlighted and one that can get worst.
I leave it to the wisdom of the Sages and Senior Email Talent, the
"usual folks" to do what they think is best for the global good and
future of SMTP - or not. SMTP specs breaking Peewee Vendor has
already taken action to provide peewee SMTP operators the option to
zap these CS clients and I'm going to market it as a "New and Improved
50% throughput SMTP enhancement."
Mucho gracias for the amusement.