Re: [ietf-smtp] [imapext] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP

My two cents: Interesting in principle but it has to be compatible withwhat gmail is doing. If the world's biggest site implements one protocoland an RFC specifies another, the RFC is forgotten.


Remember the old motto, rough consensus and running code.

Arnt

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, (continued) Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Ned Freed Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Alexey Melnikov Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, HANSEN, TONY L Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Ned Freed Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Alexey Melnikov Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Ned Freed Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, John C Klensin Re: [ietf-smtp] Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Jacob Palme Re: [ietf-smtp] [imapext] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Arnt Gulbrandsen <= Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: Request to form a new WG: JMAP, Rich Kulawiec