[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] Should we update an RFC if people refuse to implement parts of it ?

2021-06-06 11:57:27
On Sat 05/Jun/2021 20:14:28 +0200 John C Klensin wrote:

(2) At the risk of being even more pragmatic about your "very
pragmatic" proposal, I know of no way to make an authoritative
change in a standards track RFC -- whether one word or a few
paragraphs -- without generating an I-D, having it discussed in
the community, going through IETF Last Call, and publishing a
new RFC.

How about an erratum?


ietf-smtp mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>