On 6/6/2021 9:56 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Sat 05/Jun/2021 20:14:28 +0200 John C Klensin wrote:
(2) At the risk of being even more pragmatic about your "very
pragmatic" proposal, I know of no way to make an authoritative
change in a standards track RFC -- whether one word or a few
paragraphs -- without generating an I-D, having it discussed in
the community, going through IETF Last Call, and publishing a
How about an erratum?
Unfortunately, the administrative rule on RFC errata is that they are
limited to corrections where what is written does not match what was
intended. That is, documentation errors, rather than -- such as here --
But, yeah. The way to address a modest change is with a modest effort.
ietf-smtp mailing list