On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 09:47:17AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 8/4/2021 9:05 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Finally, the "Experimental" status is rather odd, given that the header
has been in use for over two decades...
There are a number of possible reasons for seeking Experimental status
to an RFC:
[...]
The current draft probably qualifies under more than one of these.
I think "Informational" is a much better fit. This would document the
long established practice of using "Delivered-To:" for loop detection.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp