Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto)
2021-08-05 12:10:32
On 8/5/2021 10:05 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
I think "Informational" is a much better fit. This would document the
long established practice of using "Delivered-To:" for loop detection.
It isn't. As I suggested, the document qualifies under more than one of
the reasons.
I left off a derivative point, which is that 'Experimental' is a signal
to the wider technical and operations community that comments are
sought. As they are, in this case.
There seems to be an inordinate focus on the loop detection benefit,
while ignoring the handling trace audit use that was, frankly, the
original reason for developing the document.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ietf-smtp] homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto, (continued)
- Re: [ietf-smtp] homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto, Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto, Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto, Viktor Dukhovni
- [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto),
Dave Crocker <=
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Tim Wicinski
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), tjw ietf
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Jeremy Harris
- Re: [ietf-smtp] "for" clause, Claus Assmann
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Viktor Dukhovni |
Next by Date: |
Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Viktor Dukhovni |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Viktor Dukhovni |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [ietf-smtp] Experimental (was: Re: homework, not an experiment, draft-crocker-email-deliveredto), Viktor Dukhovni |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|