At 10:39 AM 10/04/00 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,
that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
is it really true? it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.
Let me jog your memory:
At 06:29 PM 30/12/99 +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
A request has arrived to publish the named document as informational RFC.
The IESG wants all documents in this area to explicitely pass the WREC
working group, ...
I then sought clarification, re-sent the document to WREC (it had been sent
before), to determine if there was a conflict - there wasn't. The authors
re-submitted it.
John
---------------------------------------------------------------
Network Appliance Direct / Voicemail: +31 23 567 9615
Kruisweg 799 Fax: +31 23 567 9699
NL-2132 NG Hoofddorp Main Office: +31 23 567 9600
---------------------------------------------------------------