"David R. Conrad" wrote:
[I suspect this should probably go over to ipng or something, so this'll
be my last post]
Yes.
You can't simply banish multihoming by fiat
Wouldn't think of it (always thought the arguments that multi-homing to
different providers wasn't necessary were unrealistic).
But I thought the official solution to multi-homing in v6 was an
(provider allocated) address per interface. I will admit I haven't been
following this too closely. Which document(s) did I miss?
There are multiple solutions or proto-solutions, including the ones
that we use for IPv4. But it's a hard problem (not because of IPv6
particularly - it's intrinsically hard). So it is an ongoing discussion
in the WG.
Brian