Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

I see we're about to embark on the 7th iteration of the NAT mail wars.
I don't believe anything new is going to come out of it.


I wish I were so optimistic to think that nothing new would come
of NATs...unfortunately, the NAT group keeps inventing more cruft.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*NATs ARE* evil!*, Sean Doran* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, mcr* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Michael W. Condry* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, itojun* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Masataka Ohta* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Kurt Erik Lindqvist* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Dennis Glatting* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Scott Brim* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* <= *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Valdis . Kletnieks* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Fred Baker* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, M Dev* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Matt Holdrege* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Michael Richardson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, J. Noel Chiappa* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Tony Dal Santo*

Previous by Date:	Terminal room lost and found, John W Noerenberg II
Next by Date:	What is the IETF? -- A note of caution, John W Noerenberg II
Previous by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Scott Brim*
Next by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Valdis . Kletnieks*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]