Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd)

Jim,

I agree that it's wrong to assuming that "." is a separator, but if 
you have a subscriber named "xxx(_dot_)yyy(_at_)zzz", how likely is it really 
that a posting from "xxx(_at_)zzz" is spam?   

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Melinda Shore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Melinda Shore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Michael Richardson Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Michael Richardson Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore <= Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Dave Crocker Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), John Leslie Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James P. Salsman Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin rule-based moderation (was Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd)), James P. Salsman Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Thomas Narten Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Vernon Schryver

Previous by Date:	rule-based moderation (was Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd)), James P. Salsman
Next by Date:	Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin
Next by Thread:	Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]