Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue

Ok, I have to say something.

I agree that NATs are evil, and *should* not exist.  But, since ISP's
currently charge tons of money for more than one IP address, they always
*will* exist.

Maybe IPv6 will fix all that . . . . we can only pray . . .


--
David Frascone

        Reality is for those who can't handle Star Trek.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, (continued) Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Andrew McGregor RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Peter Ford RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Andrew McGregor Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Melinda Shore Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Joe Touch RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Peter Ford Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Melinda Shore RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Peter Ford RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, John Stracke RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Peter Ford Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, David Frascone <= Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Keith Moore Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Hans Kruse Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Keith Moore Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Claus Färber Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Harald Koch Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Joe Touch Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Keith Moore Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, james woodyatt Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Keith Moore

Previous by Date:	RE: 10 years and no ubiquitous security, Michael Choung Shieh
Next by Date:	Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Valdis . Kletnieks
Previous by Thread:	RE: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Peter Ford
Next by Thread:	Re: Netmeeting - NAT issue, Valdis . Kletnieks
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]