This message, in contrast to most to this list, deserves a very large
flood of here here. BUT NOTE: if you agree, please post just the
"here here" and otherwise respect the available bandwidth of the list.
-t
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to
owner-ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org using -f
From: Randy Bush <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: ietf <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:28:51 -0700
Sender: owner-ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
X-UIDL: 80cd1ff3c23e7806a5f9c07cf8585232
vint,
so tell me, vint. maybe i am bit slow here, but. as icann is a
shepherd of the public trust, other than personnel data, which are
obviously confidential, why is icann not fiscally and procedurally
transparent? why did there need to be any of this pool-pah in the
first place? was there a critical shortage of controversy?
randy