The world is full of bad addresses, on and off the net,
including bad ICANN domain addresses, not caused by ORSC.
People who elect to use ORSC addresses know full well what are the
limits, and they do not generally use them to hand out to people that
cannot use them.
So, this presents ORSC with some market barriers, but you have not yet
cited a single real case of disruption for anyone.
So, this discussion is entirely based on hypothetical and imaginative
problems, as far as I can see. Please find a real case to discuss.
Cheers...\Stef
At 1:19 PM -0400 8/5/02, Keith Moore wrote:
> ORSC is not doing any of this just to be disruptive and contrary.
perhaps that is not ORSC's intent. but by promoting new TLDs that
aren't usable everywhere, ORSC *is* being disruptive and contrary.
in effect it is saying "ICANN doesn't function the way *we* want it
to, it is okay for us to disrupt applications that depend on consistent
behavior of DNS". that's not socially responsible behavior. nor does
ICANN's behavior excuse ORSC's.
Keith