Re: what the "scope" disagreement is about

> > No, but stable address that can be routed globally satifies 
> > the goal having an address which can be passed from B to C 
> > and still be used to
> > reach A.   That was my point.
> Only if there is a route from C to A for the address that was passed.
> If there is a list that B can reach A by, it needs a way to tell C to
> get its own list, or a way to sort out which will actually be useful
> to C. 
NO, Tony.  We need for the network to do routing, not the hosts.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Keith