Re: requiring payment (was spam)

At 1:36 AM -0700 5/29/03, Einar Stefferud wrote:

I suggest that those who wish to more fully understand all thistrust stuff might find it useful to look at http://mcg.org.br/.
Cheers...\Stef

I would recommend this web site only to folks who want to see a verynarrow view of what trust and certification are about, a view notconsistent with most standards in the PKI arena, and one not sharedby most legal experts, ...


Steve

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: requiring payment (was spam), (continued) Re: requiring payment (was spam), Rebecca L. Page Re: requiring payment (was spam), David Morris Re: requiring payment (was spam), Anthony Atkielski Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud Re: requiring payment (was spam), David Morris Re: requiring payment (was spam), Anthony Atkielski Re: requiring payment (was spam), John C Klensin Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud Re: requiring payment (was spam), Paul Vixie Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud Re: requiring payment (was spam), Stephen Kent <= Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud Re: requiring payment (was spam), S Woodside Re: requiring payment (was spam), David Morris RE: spam, Michel Py RE: spam, shogunx RE: spam, Sabharwal, Atul Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: spam, J. Noel Chiappa Re: spam, Iljitsch van Beijnum RE: spam, Tony Hain

Previous by Date:	Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Paul Hoffman / IMC
Next by Date:	Re: spam, Vernon Schryver
Previous by Thread:	Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud
Next by Thread:	Re: requiring payment (was spam), Einar Stefferud
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]