Tony,
speaking only for myself:
I am saddened to see the length to which you are willing to go in
attempting to use process mechanisms to overturn a technical WG decision to
which you do not agree.
After reviewing the video, I personally concluded that *no matter what the
merits of the case*, the WG had clearly made a decision. My judgment of the
the form of the discussion was that it was an informed one; my judgment of
the arguments raised was that it was a correct one.
But there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that the WG made a decision, and
that the chairs were procedurally correct in recording that decision as the
outcome of the meeting.
That is, after all, what you claimed to be appealing.
Harald
--On 9. oktober 2003 16:59 -0700 Tony Hain <alh-ietf(_at_)tndh(_dot_)net> wrote:
I am saddened that it has come to this, but the IESG action has simply
prolonged the process. The only clarity in their '...somewhere to the
left...' justification is their willingness to let personal technical
biases blind them to the process failure. As such, please consider this
note to be an appeal to the IAB against the IESG decision to reject my
appeal.