assignment of IP space does not impune any other
service. Asserting otherwise is foolish. Pressing
the point, esp. in public fora, appears to be
willful ignorance. Please enjoy your blissful state.
--bill
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 02:02:45PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
The following message indicates that EP.NET has assigned an IP address to
ISC.ORG. You are quite well aware of this. Dissembling will not help
you.
--Dean
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:26:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Dean Anderson <dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com>
To: bill <bmanning(_at_)karoshi(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: Complaint regarding www.sorbs.net (204.152.186.189) (fwd)
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, bill wrote:
I have no reason to act as your relay agent. We have no
agreement in place for me to act in this manner.
The traceroute I forwarded shows that your IP addresses 198.32.176.4 is
assigned to ISC.ORG, which typically indicates a relationship.
8 paix-gw4.isc.org (198.32.176.4) 92.828 ms 91.036 ms 91.415 ms
On Mon, 10 May 2004 bmanning(_at_)vacation(_dot_)karoshi(_dot_)com wrote:
but ISC.ORG doesn't want to take a complaint. Bill Manning, of EP.NET
(ISC.ORG upstream) says he has no contract with me to accept complaints
about ISC.ORG.
--Dean
Dean... you are asserting a relationship that you have no
way to prove exists. Unless or until you can prove that
ep.net is an upstream for isc.org, please refrain from
making such statements. Traceroute is not your friend in
this case. Defamation works many ways.
--bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf