On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:41:53 EDT, shogunx said:
How about a city in the US which agrees to not engage in such
behavior, and has an international airport, and several private airports?
The cities aren't given a choice in the matter - some bright bulb in the
federal bureaucracy decided that fingerprinting airline travelers made sense,
totally overlooking the fact that the terrorists aren't so stupid they can't
catch a flight to Montreal, Ottowa, or Vancouver and rent a car.....
And if we bring suit against this obvious invasion of privacy, citing
detriment to our local tourism based economy, due to a lower rate of
international visitors, combined with a media campaign exposing the corruption
that brought all of this about in the first place? Oh, wait, the former
is already taking place.
Or just *walk* across the border, for that matter...
sleekfreak pirate broadcast
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf