Florent,
as in many other things, the IETF doesn't have a history of complete
consistency.....
in the case of an existing WG abandoning an I-D, I'm sure that the next
version of the I-D should be named draft-myfavouriteauthor-something (where
"something" can easily contain the WG name if so desired).
Sometimes, when a WG is closed with outstanding I-Ds, and some of these are
finished as individual submissions, we have allowed them to be updated
keeping the old draft name. But that's the exception.
Makes sense?
Harald
--On 27. juli 2004 08:43 +0200 Florent
<florent(_dot_)bersani(_at_)rd(_dot_)francetelecom(_dot_)fr> wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking for procedural guidance on the naming convention to be
followed for an Internet-Draft that has been adopted as a WG item and
that has therefore been granted a name like
draft-mybelovedwg-blabla-XX.txt but that is now returning to the
individual submission status - be it that the WG finally abandoned this
WG item after more technical investigations, that the WG rechartered
making this former WG item now out of scope, etc.
Thus, this Internet-Draft should probably revert to a filename similar to
draft-myfavoriteauthor-blibli-YY.txt, shouldn't it?
I couldn't unfortunately find any relevant text on this (though I tried
RFC 2026 and http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt) :-(
Any feedback most welcome,
Many thanks in advance,
Florent
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf