ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why people by NATs

2004-11-23 05:45:16
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:44:07AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
At 01:05 PM 11/22/04 -0500, Richard Shockey wrote:
Yes Fred I would _expect_ my ISP to sell me a /64 but at what price?  It 
continues to amaze me that no one discussing the IP V6 adoption issues 
will focus attention on the obvious question ..what is it going to cost me?

Is there any way the engineer can predict that or control it?

What the architecture has made exceedingly clear is that the ISP can't 
expect to dole out /128 prefixes, and has no incentive to. It could state 
that it wants to only do address autoconfiguration on its interfaces, and 
it could watch its customers vote with their feet. ISPs aren't that stupid, 
I don't think. They understand what Linksys has done with their market.

The fact that some European providers have been allocated a /20 shows they
have a plan to allocate /48's to millions of customers; ap lan at least
convincing enough to the RIR.

So certainly not a /128, and probably not a /64 :)
 
-- 
Tim

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>