--On Friday, 17 December, 2004 22:31 +0100 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no> wrote:
--On fredag, desember 17, 2004 11:56:43 -0500 John C Klensin
<john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:
But I think the old-standards team can take RFC 1269 off the
list with a note saying "obsoleted by
draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib, no action necessary".
Harald,
Sorry, but I've got a procedural problem with this.
You're right, of course.
It should be "Under active development, as evidenced by
draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib, which has been approved by the IESG".
That would be fine, thanks.
Although I would encourage taking anything off the list that a
WG is even looking at, rather than requiring that the WG and
IESG be substantially finished with it.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf