Sorry, Scott, I did not mean to imply that you had said anything more
than you actually said. I was simply asking whether you (or others)
though that non-IETF travel for IESG and IAB members should also be
reimbursed if it is not covered by an employer.
Personally, I don't understand why we would have a different
reimbursement policy for IAOC members than for IESG and IAB members.
The fact that an IAOC job may take less time than IESG or IAB
participation does not seem, to me anyway, to be a reason why we
should have a more generous reimbursement policy for the IAOC members.
Margaret
At 8:57 PM -0500 12/30/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
please do not read more into what I said than I said - I *only* meant
what I said - nothing more (I have a hard time understanding how anyone
could have misread what I said)
I did not suggest any change to the non-reimbursment of IESG & IAB
expanses - nor did I intend to
I expect the job of being an IAOC member will take little time and
almost no travel (after maybe a startup phase) - someting that someone
who was willing to put non-day-job time in could do - thus I'd like the
maximum flexability in being able to get the right people and if
that means paying expenses for one or two face to face meetings a year
(if the IAOC feels that it must meet face to face other thna at
an IETF meeting) it seems like a small price to pay
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf