"Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)"
<jonne(_dot_)soininen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com> writes:
I admit that I maybe have too much a view point of someone working for a
relatively large company. I try to approach this from a position where
the IAOC itself does not become a significant cost for IASA.
However, as these are the people that are responsible for setting the
budget and supervising the finances of the IASA and there is no real
owner to control the expenses it would be clearer to have the IAOC
members being responsible for their own expenses.
If we would decide to reimburse traveling I think we cannot make the
distinction between meetings co-located with IETF or not. There will
always be people to argue that they wouldn't or couldn't come to the
IETF and travel to IAOC meetings during the IETF should also be
reimbursed.
Jonne,
The argument you're making here is for a policy that IAOC members should
be responsible for their own expenses. That's a perfectly reasonable
policy, but the course of action you're arguing for is to write it
into the BCP so that it can't be changed without extraordinary
difficulty. Can you explain why you think that that's necessary?
-Ekr
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf