At 01:10 PM 5/4/2005, Soliman, Hesham wrote:
> One way to open up the process would be to allow any participant
> to personally request a list of candidates from Nomcom, against
> a personal non-disclosure promise. (Not my idea; this was suggested
> during last week's IESG retreat.)
=> If we do that we may as well put the list on the web. How do we define
"participant"?
There is a difference between having participants who are interested in
providing feedback ask for a copy of the list, with a promise of
confidentiality, and give feedback - versus having that information
publicly available. This sounds useful to me.
I don't think that "participant" really needs to be defined. Those who
will be interested are those who are involved. Currently, to obtain input
from a more diverse set of people, Nomcomm has to guess who is appropriate
to ask & hope that a reasonable sampling of them will be willing/interested
in responding.
Alia
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf