Re: text suggested by ADs

Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message 
> <1115166744(_dot_)5285(_dot_)25(_dot_)camel(_at_)localhost(_dot_)localdomain>,
>  Ralph Droms writes
> :
>
>
> > So, without meaning any offense to the ADs, I suggest we lump random
> > participants, WG members, doc editors and ADs together when the spec is
> > reviewed - and ensure that all comments are published in the same forum
> > and given appropriate weight based on technical merit, as supported by
> > explanatory text when the comments are published.
>
>
> Then what?  How are the comments resolved?  Who makes the final 
> decision about whether or not a document has met certain standards?
"Rough consensus and running code"

Even at this level.

Joe

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf