It might be time to revist some of these tools for interactive
collaboration. Smart is a Canadian company; maybe we should
get them as a sponosor for IETF 64.
Now _that_ would be way cool.
maybe.
however, rather than our starting with an interesting in some set of tools
that fall into an interesting, albeit large and vague -- area, perhaps we
should figure out what we need to do that we can't reasonably do now.
tools have their own expense, and we already have quite a few. adding useful
ones would be... useful. adding ones that are not highly useful would be more
hassle that they are worth.
given email, jabber and multi-casting voice/video, what additional
collaborative processes might be helpful for getting IETF face-to-face
meetings more productive?
i believe this sub-thread was triggered by an interest in something like a
real whiteboard that could be digitally captured and shared. Is that the
function we need a tool for? are there others?
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf