-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Narten wrote:
Well, there are always going to be judgement calls about whether something
is or isn't an end-run, which is where I would expect "discuss"
positions to come from on such documents.
Process-wise, this isn't right, IMO (which is where I suspect John is
coming from). Process-wise, the thing to do is respond to the RFC
editor with one of response 4 or 5 in Section 3 of RFC 3932 (e.g.,
potential end run, this needs to be reviewed by the IETF', to make it
clear exactly what state the document is.
The decision of whether something is an "end run" should be relatively
fast. One can always air on the conservative side if in doubt and say
"looks like end run", while getting more detailed reviews.
If in doubt, it's more productive say "MIGHT be an end run" and ask for
more time. Throwing tar isn't a substitute for hesitating before throwing.
Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCilFvE5f5cImnZrsRAnakAJ9X5nraEdwdyUDfDdvR6il0ot5AwACgvB8p
3TCLVLLuiyg16aJ9y5xs9yI=
=vSBT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf