ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IANA Considerations

2005-06-10 09:39:05
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Ned Freed wrote:
What exactly is it that you
think should be done (in addition to careful reviews) that would help
reduce the odds that the careful review find issues with the IANA
instructions (or lack thereof)?

Simple: The requirement that an  IANA considerations section be included in RFC
not containing any IANA actions needs to be dropped. I have been extremely
clear ahout this.

It's good, because this is already the case. Even if you're required to add a "null" IANA considerations section in the internet-drafts when being sent to the IESG, the RFC-editor removes the IANA considerations section completely if it doesn't have any real content.

Anything else?

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>