On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Ned Freed wrote:
>> What exactly is it that you
>> think should be done (in addition to careful reviews) that would help
>> reduce the odds that the careful review find issues with the IANA
>> instructions (or lack thereof)?
>
> Simple: The requirement that an IANA considerations section be included in
RFC
> not containing any IANA actions needs to be dropped. I have been extremely
> clear ahout this.
It's good, because this is already the case. Even if you're required
to add a "null" IANA considerations section in the internet-drafts
when being sent to the IESG, the RFC-editor removes the IANA
considerations section completely if it doesn't have any real content.
Anything else?
It is the requirement that Internet Drafts always contain IANA
considerations sections that has to go. What the RFC Editor does after document
approval is not the issue here.
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf