At 06:56 PM 7/27/2005 -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
Phillip and Joel,
--On Wednesday, 27 July, 2005 13:32 -0700 "Hallam-Baker,
Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'd like to
see some other options considered.
How about a NONCOM review situation roughly such as this:
if there is more than one candidate that can do the AD position for a
particular area, if an active AD is one on the short list, and if that AD
has alraedy severed 2 terms, the existing AD is not the one chosen for the
new term.
This will cause turnover only when there is an acceptable replacement as
determined by the NONCOM, and not leave a situation in which there isn't
any viable choice.
As indicated in my longer note, my goal was to promote turnover
and more circulation of ADs back into technical work,
leadership, and mentoring at the WG level.
I think the above suggestion does this without leaving the IESG with a less
than desirable candidate.
cheers,
James
*******************
Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf