2. An IETF "netiquette" committee, to offload list banning procedures
from the IESG.
I don't think so. I prefer that this responsibility stay with a few
individuals, so that it is taken very seriously -- not only by them
but by everyone. A committee would lead to dilution of responsibility
as well as endless discussion on every dispute.
Good point.
As much as I believe the IETF should not give veto authority to any single
individual, this is one case where it is probably better.
My sense is that, without exception, IETF participants involved in deciding
process objections has taken their role extremely seriously. It's difficult
to believe that this would be any different. In addition, any abuse by the
ombudsperson will be very quickly reported and corrected.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf