On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:00:51 -0400
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb(_at_)cs(_dot_)columbia(_dot_)edu> wrote:
In message <p06200745bf63239c4b83(_at_)[192(_dot_)168(_dot_)2(_dot_)2]>,
Margaret Wasserman writes:
Harald is attempting to assemble information that he will use to
propose a PR-action (a "Posting Rights" action), as described in RFC
3683. Once he has assembled this information, he will presumably use
the information to persuade a member of the IESG (an AD) to sponsor
this action. That AD would then be in charge of running a fair and
open process to decide whether or not Jefsey Morphin's posting rights
should be revoked.
I confess that I'm uneasy about Harald's action. It has too much the
air of an unpopularity contest -- every one who doesn't like Jefsey's
should sign on to kick him off the mailing list.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Hello;
I think it should make you uneasy. Just wait until someone on the other end of
this puts up a
similar petition and gets a few thousands signatories after posting an
inflammatory diary to the
right blog or mailing list.
FWIW, I have read through the various emails on this (including the emails to
the
IETF list from M Morphin), and I do not support Harald's action.
OTOH, I have changed my mind on the other case based on Mr. Anderson's recent
emails, and
do support David Kessens's recent action.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf