I can understand that you may be reluctant to dive back in having
seen the WG formed but I think "not listening" isn't really correct.
Maybe you meant "didn't listen"?
Even if that's what he really meant, it is not correct.
My recollection is that every issue raised, by anyone, got considered.
Well, you kept claiming that we couldn't possibly anticipate the ways in
which the DKIM protocol would be used, therefore there was no
justification for the WG to change DKIM significantly from its original
design.
That's not what I would call "consideration". There are lots of things
I could call it, none of which are flattering.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf