ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

2007-04-25 13:35:30
Sorry, bad choice of words. 

I'm not sure, but almost certainly not IETF.  IETF doesn't do apis.  I'm
trying to get MS+Apple+Linux and maybe some embedded OS folks to agree to
have a common api.  I don't know if that will work yet.

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: g(_dot_)caron(_at_)bell(_dot_)ca 
[mailto:g(_dot_)caron(_at_)bell(_dot_)ca]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:31 PM
To: br(_at_)brianrosen(_dot_)net; pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com; 
jschnizl(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com;
David_Hankins(_at_)isc(_dot_)org
Cc: geopriv(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

Brian,

<we will specify an api on the O/S the application is running>

Who is "we", geopriv?

Guy Caron
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Brian Rosen [mailto:br(_at_)brianrosen(_dot_)net]
Envoyé : 25 avril 2007 14:29
À : 'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'; 'John Schnizlein'; 'David W. Hankins'
Cc : 'GEOPRIV WG'; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Objet : RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

On most devices of interest, this is a non issue; they are small embedded
devices, like phones.

For other situations, for example a sip softclient running on a laptop, we
will specify an api on the O/S the application is running.  The api will
front end a set of "Location Configuration Protocols" of which DHCP is
one.

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:50 AM
To: John Schnizlein; David W. Hankins
Cc: GEOPRIV WG; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group
Hums

But how does my application access it?

DHCP is not something that an application layer program should be
allowed
to perform. It is a security issue. For good reason performing DHCP
operations requires privileges beyond mere network connectivity on
Windows.

That is why configuring application programs from DHCP never caught on.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Schnizlein [mailto:jschnizl(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 6:41 PM
To: David W. Hankins
Cc: GEOPRIV WG; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68
Working Group Hums

The reason that DHCP is appropriate for information about the
location of the host is that the scope of DHCP administration
usually does match the local network to which the host is
attached.  Location is local information.

John

On Apr 20, 2007, at 3:38 PM, David W. Hankins wrote:

The point is that the ISO L(x) is not what one considers
when judging
wether or not a certain configuration value "would make a good band
name.  I mean DHCP option."

What we (strive to) consider instead is the administrative scope of
the configuration information, and wether it matches common and
practical use of DHCP.


On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:47 PM, David W. Hankins wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 03:38:40PM -0700, Hallam-Baker,
Phillip wrote:
DHCP is a layer 3 technology that talks directly to layer 2.

DHCP is a technology that dynamically configures hosts.

If a host has a configuration knob that might reasonably
and properly
be set by the systems administrator or the network you are
presently
attached to, then it is reasonable and proper to configure it via
DHCP.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>