I don't disagree. I do not claim that this is necessarily binding to
any specific incident in the IETF. I removed the ifare tag line from
the subject. I want the issue discussed at a much higher level than any
one decision. Individual decisions have state associated with them, and
we don't need to discuss them with the community at large.
Lakshminath
On 6/12/2007 1:29 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Lakshminath" == Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> writes:
Lakshminath> Folks, If you want the history of this thread, please
Lakshminath> see the SAAG mailing list archive.
Lakshminath> Thomas,
To be clear I'm not sure that I* opinions have been given special
treatment in this case. So, carry on with the discussion, but be
aware that it may not actually have any binding to a specific incident
in the IETF.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf