Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declini

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2007-06-27 15:52, Joe Touch wrote:
> > Keith Moore wrote:
> > > > We could have more ADs and split and/or layer the work to reduce the
> > > > per-person load. That may not be the only - or even best - way forward,
> > > >   
> > > It's not clearly even a way forward.  the more ADs there are, the harder
> > > it is to coordinate between the ADs and the areas.
> > Yes, each AD becomes less efficient, but perhaps the goal shouldn't be
> > the efficiency of the individual volunteers but the ability to be more
> > inclusive in who we can consider for these roles.
> It isn't an issue of individual efficiency. A committee of 15 is already
> unwieldy given our desire for consensus; the IESG thought long and
> carefully before the last increase (from 6 to 7 Areas). I don't see
> how it can be increased further.
I don't see increasing the areas; I see splitting them down as a
possible way. Leaving an AD at the top level with less work, and having
sub-ADs report to them.

Joe

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf