Ted Hardie <hardie(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com> writes:
No. My point was that for the IETF, interoperability is the goal, not some
general statement about goodness of Free software. In many/most/maybe all
cases, this will require any IPR restrictions to be GPL compatible.
Can you think of an open-source project interested in the work of
CCAMP?
GNU Zebra, Quagga, and MPLS-linux are three projects that come up by
searching for relevant technology.
I think you are missing the point, though. The point is to make sure
that a free software implementation of IETF technology is _possible_.
That doesn't necessarily mean that you won't be able to find an IETF WG
with technical work that may not have been implemented already in free
software.
/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf