Ned Freed wrote:
I was unable to attend the last three IETFs in person so maybe something has
changed, but at previous meetings my success rate at keeping a wireless
connection going during the plenary hasn't been all that great. This means
IPv6 issues are likely going to be conflated with wireless issues and heaven
knows what else.
My own personal experience at the last two IETFs has been pretty good.
Vancouver was rock solid throughout the facility, and during the
plenary. There was a single dark spot in Chicago in a particular room.
I think the team has really gotten quite good at managing wireless.
This, by the way, was a good example of us learning by doing. It took a
while for things to get kinked out, but in the end we now know a large
wireless room can be done. I imagine the same would be true for IPv6.
I think the thing people are struggling with is much more basic:
individuals don't get anything by moving to v6. With wireless I got
freedom from having to stick a cable here or there. Maybe we should
hand out lollipops or something for those who use v6.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf