Re: IONs & discuss criteria

All of this depends on the quality of the review and how it's followed 
up on.  Having to push back on insistent nonsense is a problem.  A good 
review that engenders a lot of discussion on substantial issues is very 
worthwhile.  We should foster those -- they are important.  This is no 
different than what happens within a WG.
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf