Eliot Lear wrote:
Russ,
When IETF lists are housed somewhere other than ietf.org, they are
supposed to include an archive recipient so that there is an archive
available at ietf.org (perhaps in addition to the one kept at the
place where the list is housed).
I'll agree with Phill's conclusion on this one.
I think there is probably convenience value to housing the mailing lists
at the IETF. It allows for a single whitelist, reduction in those
annoying monthly messages that we eventually all filter into the
bitbucket. Also, it probably is easier to effect and audit policy
(such as we have any) in terms of message retention, uniform access, etc.
The other things is when we start DKIM signing (HINT HINT), it will
give a single identity for reputation, etc to latch onto.
Mike
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf