Scott Brim wrote:
I see your point, but does it warrant a perpetual irrevocable ban on
all interactions?
Scott,
When someone demonstrates a permanent pattern of disruptive behavior, with no
counter-balancing pattern of useful contribution, their presence is purely a
distraction. Ignoring a distraction is preferable, but some distractions cannot
be reasonably ignored; they force themselves on us.
They constantly cost us wasteful effort; in the aggregate -- over time, and
across the community -- quite a lot of effort.
Such folk warrant banning. Permanently and completely.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf