Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handli

On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:13 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> > > > > I am under
> > > > the understanding the the IESG Note in RFC is provided by the  
> > > > IESG not
> > > > by the RFC Editor. Is there a document that says otherwise? (I'm
> > > > certainly open to the possibility that perhaps these documents  
> > > > should
> > > > not have an IESG note but that seems a different issue)
> > > My understanding of this text is that the IESG can recommend text,
> > > including an IESG Note.  The RFC Editor can accept it or not.

As Russ said: the IESG can suggest text, which can be an IESG note.  
The RFC Editor, more specifically the Independent Submission Editor,  
is responsible for the followup, which includes the possibility of the  
variation described below.
FWIW (and in my no-hats opinion) this 'negotiation' between IESG and  
ISE should all happen well before the RFC is submitted to the  
production center and the RFC Series Editor (RSE) should in general  
not be part of this loop. Only if the ISE and the IESG cannot come to  
agreement then the RSE is called in as described in RFC5620 section  
4.1.3.


> ...
> > I'm pretty sure, though, that there has been pushback and negotiation
> > on quite a few occasions. It's important that the RFC Editor keeps
> > this power, in the general interest of checks and balances.
>
> +1.
>
> One can debate various details and costs about the RFC Editor  
> function.  But it really is quite useful to have the editor exert an  
> independent review of IESG efforts to modify an RFC.
> Not because the IESG is suspect, but because it is deeply involved  
> in the topics it comments on and that could cause misguided  
> decisions.  By contrast, the RFC Editor can consider suggested IESG  
> notes with detachment.
> My impression, too, is that this has produced revised IESG text.
>
> d/
> --





________________________________________________________

Olaf M. Kolkman                        NLnet Labs
                                       Science Park 140,
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/               1098 XG Amsterdam

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf