Olaf,
I meant the IETF community. Since the note would exist to clarify the
relationship with documents developed by the IETF community, that seems the
right one to evaluate whether a note is needed.
As to who calls the consensus, that is a tricky one. How about the IAB
chair?
Tim
On 9/8/09 10:36 AM, "Olaf Kolkman" <olaf(_at_)NLnetLabs(_dot_)nl> wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Polk, William T. wrote:
I believe Sam's suggestion offers a good compromise position: if the
IESG
and RFC Editor do not come to an agreement, we should last call the
proposed
IESG Note and let the community determine whether (1) this is an
exceptional
case meriting a note and (2) if the text accurately clarifies the
relationship.
Which community, The IETF community or the wider RFC community? And
who calls the consensus?
--Olaf
________________________________________________________
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
Science Park 140,
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ 1098 XG Amsterdam
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf